首页> 外文OA文献 >Evaluating the short-term and long-term effects of an internet-based aural rehabilitation programme for hearing aid users in general clinical practice : a randomised controlled trial.
【2h】

Evaluating the short-term and long-term effects of an internet-based aural rehabilitation programme for hearing aid users in general clinical practice : a randomised controlled trial.

机译:在一般临床实践中,评估基于互联网的助听器用户听觉康复计划的短期和长期效果:一项随机对照试验。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

OBJECTIVE: Guided internet-based intervention beyond hearing aid (HA) fitting has been shown to be efficacious in randomised controlled trials (RCTs). However, internet interventions have rarely been applied clinically as a part of regular aural rehabilitation (AR). Our aim was to evaluate the effectiveness of internet-based AR for HA users from a clinical population. OUTCOME MEASURES: The Hearing Handicap Inventory for the Elderly (HHIE) was used as the primary outcome measure, and the Communication Strategies Scale (CSS) and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale were used as secondary outcome measures. All questionnaires were administered before and directly after the intervention and at 6 months postintervention. METHODS: We used a parallel group design (RCT). The data were collected in 2013-2014 at three different clinics. Seventy-four HA users were randomly assigned to receive either full internet-based AR (intervention group, n=37) or one element of the internet-based AR (control group, n=37). RESULTS: Data were analysed following the intention-to-treat principle. Each group showed improved HHIE scores over time and did not differ significantly from each other. The intervention group showed significantly greater improvement compared with the control group for the CSS total and the non-verbal subscale scores. The intervention group and control group were also subdivided into two age groups: 20-59 years and 60-80 years. Significantly better improvement on the CSS total and non-verbal subscale scores was found in the older group compared with the younger participants. CONCLUSIONS: This study indicates that participants in an internet-based intervention applied in general clinical practice showed improved self-reported communication skills compared with a control group. Receiving a full intervention was not more effective in improving self-reported hearing problems than receiving just one element of the internet-based intervention. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: This trial is registered at ClinicalTrals.gov, NCT01837550; results.
机译:目的:在随机对照试验(RCT)中,已经证明,在助听器(HA)之外进行基于互联网的引导性干预是有效的。但是,互联网干预很少在临床上用作常规听觉康复(AR)的一部分。我们的目的是评估临床人群中基于互联网的AR对HA用户的有效性。观察指标:以老年人听力障碍量表(HHIE)为主要指标,以沟通策略量表(CSS)和医院焦虑抑郁量表为主要指标。所有问卷均在干预之前和之后以及干预后6个月进行管理。方法:我们使用并行组设计(RCT)。数据于2013-2014年在三个不同的诊所收集。随机分配了74个HA用户以接收完整的基于Internet的AR(干预组,n = 37)或基于Internet的AR的一个元素(对照组,n = 37)。结果:按照意向治疗原则分析数据。每组的HHIE得分均随时间提高,并且彼此之间无显着差异。与对照组相比,干预组在CSS总分和非语言分量表得分上的改善明显高于对照组。干预组和对照组也分为两个年龄组:20-59岁和60-80岁。与年轻参与者相比,老年组的CSS总和非语言分量表得分有显着改善。结论:这项研究表明,与对照组相比,在一般临床实践中使用基于互联网的干预措施的参与者显示出自我报告的沟通技巧得到了改善。完全接受干预对于改善自我报告的听力问题并不比仅接受基于互联网的干预措施中的一种有效。试验注册号:该试验在ClinicalTrals.gov上注册,NCT01837550;结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号